Timo Hirvonen wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:53:20 +0000 (UTC) > Mark Wooding <mdw@distorted.org.uk> wrote: > > >>By the way, am I the only person who /likes/ having all the git-* >>programs on his path? It makes shell completion work fairly well >>without having to install strange completion scripts which get out of >>date for one thing. > > > I like git-* for the same reason. But if git potty had aliases for long > commands then git-* commands would become irrelevant. Especially > "git co" would be nice. It even would be faster to type than > git-ch<tab>c<tab>o<tab> ;) > It would indeed, and it should also be fairly trivial. However, adding short-hands that are identical with cvs and svn but does a totally different thing (well, not really different, but cvs users will be surprised) is not necessarily a good thing. It would be better, imo, to add ambiguity detection for commands that lacks an exact match. That way "git br" and "git branch" would be identical and the logic only needs doing once. I'm not terribly excited about it though, so... -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Mar 17 01:40:28 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-17 01:40:40 EST