Re: bug?: stgit creates (unneccessary?) conflicts when pulling

From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Date: 2006-03-10 22:13:41
On 09/03/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Trying to implement this, I've just noticed that git-read-tree has a
> > --aggressive option which takes care of the file removals. Adding this
> > option lowered the pushing time in StGIT from ~2 min to under 2
> > seconds (merges between 2.6.14 and the latest kernel). There's
> > probably no need to deal with file removals in pg--merge-all anymore.
>
> Yup, it was originally done to improve the performance of
> resolve merge strategy, but I am glad somebody else has found
> use for it.

Actually, I asked for it about 6 months ago:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112677889118711&w=2

and I got the reply from you :-):

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112690084826630&w=2

Anyway, it's good we have it, it saved me some time with implementing
Shawn's merging algorithm.

--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Fri Mar 10 22:14:18 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-10 22:14:30 EST