Re: git-status too verbose?

From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Date: 2006-03-08 05:26:34
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 10:22:28 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> What I want to know is "what is committed", and "what is not".

Agreed. Me too.

> That table makes it really really hard to see what you are committing, if 
> you have a hundred files changed that are _not_ being committed. The 
> actual committed information will be interspersed in the files you're not 
> interested in, and vice versa.

The current sorting and grouping should not be changed.

I just want to be able to know if I'm looking at a section of
"committed" vs. "not committed" files when the headers have scrolled
off.

I think it's really just that one bit of information needed. Maybe a
'*' before the word 'modified' (or 'M' or whatever)?

-Carl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Received on Wed Mar 08 05:29:09 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-08 05:29:21 EST