On 3/2/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote: > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes: > > > But if somebody does the get_sha1() magic, and Junio agrees, then I think > > it would be a great thing to do. > > I am inclined to agree here. Aren't we doing a lot of work (changes in core git, and corresponding changes in the porcelain) when simple changes in porcelain would suffice? Let's imagine that - git-commit refuses to commit to a head that has a corresponding remote (cg-commit does this already with heads that match something in 'branches') - git-$SCMimport scripts generate a semi-bogus remotes/headname entry - git-pull/push can spot and ignore the semi-bogus remotes/headname entry - this means that `touch remotes/foo` is now a cheap way of making the head readonly - depending on the git-$SCMimport script, the remotes/headname file can perhaps contain useful configuration data for the import, so git-$SCMimport headname does the right thing. cheers, martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Mar 02 08:41:20 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-03-02 08:41:33 EST