On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Carl Worth wrote: > > I've been exploring the potential for git-sync, and I found some odd > behavior with "git reset --hard". It appears that if the current tree > has some directory structure (at least two levels deep) that does not > exist in the tree being reset to, that empty directories are left > around after the reset: "git reset --hard xyz" in many ways is a sledgehammer, and it says "I want the state at the point of xyz, and I don't care _what_ the heck the current state is". Now, that's somewhat problematic, exactly because of that "screw the current state" thing. It actually tries to remove files (see the "tmp-exists" thing in the git-reset script), but it's being pretty stupid about it. It also very definitely will not try to remove subdirectories, empty or not. (I say that without being able to read perl, so I might be wrong. Maybe it tries and just fails). Anyway, if you want to do the "gentle and smart" thing, you should probably actually use git-read-tree -m -u <oldtree> <newtree> which unlike "git-reset" will gently _update_ the tree from one version to another (and will error out if your checked-out copy doesn't match the old tree). And the gentle way will actually do the right thing wrt subdirectories (note that it will _not_ remove empty subdirectories if you have left files - like object files - around that it doesn't know about: that's not an error, but the unknown file will not, nor the subdirectory, be removed). And yes, git-reset should probably do the subdirectory thing too. In the meantime you should think of it as the brute-force and not very smart way (in Calvin and Hobbes terms, "git reset" is Moe). Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Feb 16 12:36:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-02-16 12:36:15 EST