On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 12:02 +0100, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > Caching features have been discussed, but that means the daemon needs to > have write-access to some directory within the repository. Caching seems a bit dicey to me; security concerns and all. I would much rather have it discover packs on disk that provided a subset of the necessary objects; repository cloning would then be a process of delivering any available packs and then packing up the remaining objects. Clever administration of the repository could then construct a single pack of 'historical' data followed by periodic packs of incremental data. Yeah, I know, I should just implement this and see how well it works in practice. I apologize for thinking in public. -- keith.packard@intel.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-02-14 10:51:06 EST