On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > The one to git-tar-tree I've already applied, mostly because I > was not careful enough and especially I did not care enough > about performance of that program. On my slow machine the tip > of kernel before you came back takes 9.2 seconds wallclock as > opposed to 8.7 seconds to tar up, so the patch degrades the > performance by about 5%. Maybe we would want to revert that one > as well. Hmm. Rather than revert it outright, it might be better to make it use the nicer parsing functions and "struct tree_desc". It shouldn't look _that_ different from the "struct tree" version: instead of doing item = item->next; it would do update_tree_entry(tree); instead. Give me a minute, I'll send you patches. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Feb 01 09:08:54 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-02-01 09:09:03 EST