"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes: > On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:30:48AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> The "ignore the index" approach is the simple one to explain. It's >> strictly less powerful, but hey, what else is new? > > Yeah, I do wonder what's likely to be the best approach for most users. > My goal with the new tutorial was to get a reader doing something fun > and useful as quickly as possible. So it just refers elsewhere for any > discussion of the index file or SHA1 names. But probably everyone needs > to pick up that stuff eventually anyway, and maybe it's better to get to > it a little sooner, I dunno. I think many good stuff git offers would not be helpful to the users until index is understood as the third entity, in addition to the usual "committed state" and "working tree state". It might be better to talk about it sooner rather than later. And the tool is geared towards taking advantage of it, so until the user understands that, behaviour of some tools would feel unintuitive. You can have local throw-away modifications while applying patches and merging (I once broke merges by ignoring that it is perfectly valid to have index and working tree files be different and keep working that way. That was a hard lesson). The index file knows what working tree changes are meant to be committed. Another thing I find useful, which cannot be done without index, is to sanity check while developing. When "git diff" gives too many diffs, running update-index on paths that I think are more-or-less OK helps to reduce clutter, and I can view only further changes to those paths. In a sense, update-index can be thought of to check in the changes without committing. You can check in number of times, and the cumulative effect is committed later. "reset --mixed" is undoing these uncommitted check-ins. "reset --hard" undoes the last commit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Feb 01 06:34:00 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-02-01 06:34:12 EST