Re: [PATCH] "sleep 1" sleeps too little on cygwin

From: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Date: 2006-01-19 05:52:29
Junio C Hamano, Wed, Jan 18, 2006 18:00:30 +0100:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
> 
> > And where does the time lag (required for the test) come from now?
> 
> The point of the change is that it avoids to depend on the time
> lag.  The test is to make sure we catch dirty index; instead of
> timestamp difference it now uses i-num difference for that.
> 

this is probable unsafe too: not all systems export inodes
(the recent cygwin breakage comes to mind).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Jan 19 05:53:27 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-19 05:53:36 EST