Petr Baudis wrote: >Dear diary, on Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:09:17PM CET, I got a letter >where Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> said that... > > >>... Why would that be the optimal method? >> >Ow. I suppose that's what you call "blinded by invalid implicit >assumptions". Obviously, if you are ok with such a grand move, this is >the best. > > Sorry, that came out a bit harsher than I had intended. >This also reminds me that I should finally merge the cg-mv patch. > >> git fetch ../r1/ >> GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/tmp-index git-read-tree FETCH_HEAD >> GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/tmp-index git-checkout-cache -a -u >> git-update-cache --add -- $(GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/tmp-index git-ls-files) >> cp .git/FETCH_HEAD .git/MERGE_HEAD >> git commit >> >> > >But if you want to have an idea what's actually going on on the high >level, perhaps the > > cd r2 > cg-branch-add r1 ../r1/.git > cg-fetch r1 > cg-merge -j r1 > >might be easier. ;-) > Ah, yes, cg-merge seems like it might be somewhat simpler here. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-19 01:40:18 EST