Dear diary, on Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 03:09:17PM CET, I got a letter where Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> said that... > ... Why would that be the optimal method? Ow. I suppose that's what you call "blinded by invalid implicit assumptions". Obviously, if you are ok with such a grand move, this is the best. This also reminds me that I should finally merge the cg-mv patch. > git fetch ../r1/ > GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/tmp-index git-read-tree FETCH_HEAD > GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/tmp-index git-checkout-cache -a -u > git-update-cache --add -- $(GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/tmp-index git-ls-files) > cp .git/FETCH_HEAD .git/MERGE_HEAD > git commit But if you want to have an idea what's actually going on on the high level, perhaps the cd r2 cg-branch-add r1 ../r1/.git cg-fetch r1 cg-merge -j r1 might be easier. ;-) -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Of the 3 great composers Mozart tells us what it's like to be human, Beethoven tells us what it's like to be Beethoven and Bach tells us what it's like to be the universe. -- Douglas Adams - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Thu Jan 19 01:21:29 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-19 01:21:37 EST