Re: [kernel.org users] [RFC] "clone --naked"?

From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Date: 2006-01-16 20:06:05
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 23:47 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@rz.uni-regensburg.DE> writes:
> 
> > On 14 Jan 2006 at 15:39, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >> BTW, I have been meaning to make this easier, by introducing a
> >> new option to "git clone", like this:
> > ...
> > You must be over 21 to use --naked, however ;-)
> > Maybe you find a better word.
> 
> Linus seems to use word "bare" sometimes.  Checking the git-core
> documentation, repository-layout documentation first used the
> word naked on Sep 1 2005, while there is no mention of "bare"
> repository anywhere.  Maybe "bare" is preferred?
> 
> I hope you do not mind my sending this message out to git list
> to take a quick poll.

While I don't give a rats bottom about the "21"-ness of naked, "naked"
is more likely to trigger spam traps than "bare" though... just a side
consideration but unfortunately needed nowadays ;(

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Mon Jan 16 20:07:19 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-16 20:07:28 EST