Junio C Hamano wrote: > A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> writes: > >>Junio C Hamano wrote: >>>It really does not make sense not doing --topo-order. >>I disagree. I do like to see the chronological commit history of some >>repositories. > > But the thing is if you do chronological order, you may not see > enough commits without --more=, because show-branches stops at > the first common commit. Try it yourself in a repository with > merges on topic branches of different vintage, with and without > the option, to see where output stops. Interesting, I don't think I've ever looked far enough to triggered the stop condition in my repositories of interest before. How about making topo-order the default but having an option for chronological order? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Jan 13 16:29:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-13 16:29:15 EST