"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes: > That's the only reference I can find to the "tag <tag>" notation, and > it's a bit unhelpful as written. (What backward compatibility?) > > How about the following?--b. Makes sense. Thanks. Backward compatibility is that it was only either "<branch>" or "tag <tag>". When heads/branch or tags/tag came later, supporting the separate word form "tag <tag>" was a bit cumbersome but was done for b/c. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Jan 13 15:01:22 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2006-01-13 15:01:30 EST