Jon Nelson wrote: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Andreas Ericsson wrote: > > >>Jon Nelson wrote: >> >>>Should *all* commits be reachable via at least one branch? I ran into a >>>situation this weekend that has me a little confused. I had performed a >>>number of commits and such and I noticed that the author and committer info >>>had suboptimal values. A bit of searching led me to a comment made by Linus >>>that basically said "go hack git-convert-objects", which I did. After >>>performing git-convert-objects on every commit object in .git/refs/heads and >>>the requisite pruning, etc... just about everything looked fine. However, I >>>still had a long series of commits that contained the wrong information. >>>Further inspection makes it appear as though these commits are not reachable >>>via any branch, although they are /all/ reachable via a series of tags. I >>>worked around the problem by further modifying git-convert-objects to also >>>understand tags (at least the basic ones I've got) and that's all taken care >>>of, but the question remains: should *all* commit objects be reachable by at >>>least one branch? >>> >> >>AFAIU, yes. >> >>For future reference, what you should have done is this; >> >>$ git format-patch --mbox <first-unscrewed-commit-ish> >># edit commit-messages in generated patches >>$ git reset --hard <first-unscrewed-commit-ish> >>$ for i in 00*.txt; do git apply < $i; done >>$ git prune;# to get rid of the unreachable objects AFTER you've checked >>everything's all right >> >>If things fail, do >> >>$ git reset --hard ORIG_HEAD >> >>and ask again. >> >>I'm afraid I can't help you fix up your repository from the state it's >>in now. AFAIK, there's no tool to do it automagically. > > > The repository seems just fine with this single exception - no branch > contains a reference to the commit that forms the chain of commits that > would otherwise be described as a branch. As I understand it, then, the > only thing that is missing is an entry in .git/refs/heads. > > Experimentally, I added that entry by determining the first commit in > that chain and echoing that sha1 into .git/refs/heads/some_name and that > works as expected. > Lucky thing. I expect you still had all the objects required for the tree to do this. If you had run 'git prune' on the repo they would have been lost for good though. > I suspect that the root cause was a 'git branch -D' I issued a while > back. My question is this: if deleting a branch in that manner caused me > to enter this situation, is that a bug or no? It's not a bug. You probably meant to do $ git branch -d -D forces removal even if there are objects reachable only through that branch. The man-page says so, but in git'ish, which isn't always intuitive until you've grown familiar with the glossary.txt doc. -- Andreas Ericsson andreas.ericsson@op5.se OP5 AB www.op5.se Tel: +46 8-230225 Fax: +46 8-230231 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Dec 20 04:53:31 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-12-20 04:53:38 EST