Re: branching and supporting a tagged kernel version

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: 2005-12-13 11:01:41
Dear diary, on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:58:38AM CET, I got a letter
where Don Zickus <dzickus@gmail.com> said that...
> Thanks for clearing things up.
> 
> > I'll refrain from saying that it is not the usual way to work
> > with git, since you seem to know what you are doing.  So let's
> 
> Either this or cvs. :)  Anyway my work involves releasing a platform
> to customers who don't want  to constantly upgrade their kernel.  And
> instead of waiting for bugs to be filed, I was just trying to find a
> way to be pro-active and fix certain bugs _before_ our customers hit
> them.

You might also consider managing your patches in StGIT, which could give
you more comfort for managing them. StGIT provides quilt-like
functionality on top of GIT, and it's easy to reorder, add, and remove
patches, as well as submit them to the upstream and remove them
automatically when they get merged.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Dec 13 11:02:17 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-12-13 11:02:23 EST