Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes: > > Nikolai Weibull <mailing-lists.git@rawuncut.elitemail.org> writes: > > > The documentation for git-prune was lacking descriptions of the head > > > arguments and the -- option. > > > > > > +<head>...:: > > > + The heads to look for unreachable objects in. This is > > > + relative to $GIT_DIR (e.g., "HEAD", "refs/heads/master"). > > > + When unspecified, all heads are updated to match the > > > + remote repository. > > ? updated to match??? > Come to think of it, why would anybody want to pass heads explicitly? > It seems to me that it would allow you to _lose_ objects referenced > only from omitted branches... Sorry. I have no idea why I pasted in that description. How about: <head>...:: A head to use for an unreachability trace. (This mimics the description of <object> in git-fsck-objects.) nikolai -- Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/! Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden. main(){printf(&linux["\021%six\012\0"],(linux)["have"]+"fun"-97);} - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Dec 09 11:50:58 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-12-09 11:51:05 EST