I was playing with the implications of the "deleted file in the index is not a conflict" merge rule, and came up with the following octopus test which fails to work. Note line 2 when choosing a directory to run it in! #!/bin/bash -xe rm -rf .git git-init-db echo "File A" > a echo "File B" > b echo "File C" > c git-add a b c git-commit -a -m "Octopus test repository" git-checkout -b a echo "Modifications to a" >> a git-commit -a -m "Modified file a" git-checkout -b b master echo "Modifications to b" >> b git-commit -a -m "Modified file b" git-checkout -b c master rm c git-commit -a -m "Deleted file c" git-checkout master #git merge --no-commit "" master c b a #git merge --no-commit "" master a b c git-rev-parse a b c > .git/FETCH_HEAD git-octopus (Commented out are the first few things I tried.) Can someone tell me why this doesn't work? It should be a simple in-index merge. Right after the incomplete merge (I hacked this into the git-octopus script), git-ls-files -s produces 100644 8fb437b77759c7709c122fbc8ba43f720e1fbc0a 0 a 100644 b3418f25da4393974aa205e2863f012e5b503369 0 b 100644 df78d3d51c369e1d2f1eadb73464aadd931d56b4 1 c 100644 df78d3d51c369e1d2f1eadb73464aadd931d56b4 2 c Which should be case 10 of the t/t1000-read-tree-m-3way.sh table and succeed. Other things I've discovered... 1) The MAJOR difference between "git checkout" and "git reset --hard" are that git-checkout takes a *head* as an argument and changes the .git/HEAD *symlink* to point to that head (ln -sf refs/heads/<head> .git/HEAD). "git reset" takes a *commit* (<rev>) as an argument and changes the head that .git/HEAD points to to have that commit as its hew tip (git-rev-parse <rev> > .git/HEAD) All the other behavioural differences are relatively minor, and appropriate for this big difference. 2) Don't use "git branch" to create branches, unless you really *don't* want to switch to them. Use "git checkout -b". 3) Dumb question: why does "git-commit-tree" need "-p" before the parent commit arguments? Isn't just argv[2]..argv[argc-1] good enough? 4) If the "git-read-tree" docs for "--reset", does "ignored" mean "not overwritten" or "overwritten"? 5) The final "error" message on "git-merge --no-commit" is a bit alarming for a newbie who uses it because they don't quite trust git's enough to enable auto-commit. And it should be changed from ""Automatic merge failed/prevented; fix up by hand" to "fix up and commit by hand". Or how about: "Automatic commit prevented; edit and commit by hand." which actually tells the truth. 6) The "pickaxe" options are being a bit confusing, and the fact they're only documented in cvs-migration.txt doesn't help. 7) The git-tag man page could use a little better description of -a. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Dec 02 20:19:59 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-12-02 20:20:06 EST