Re: git-name-rev off-by-one bug

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: 2005-11-30 20:05:52
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> writes:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
>
>> On Tue, 29 Nov 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>> 
>>> I have actually resolved one conflicting merge with this and it
>>> was OK, except that it was a bit unpleasant when I first did
>>> "git-diff-index HEAD" without giving any path ;-),
>>
>> What does "git-diff-files" do? Just output a lot of nasty "unmerged" 
>> messages?
>
> That was not what was unpleasant.  What was unpleasant was those
> "unmerged" messages were buried under heap of normal diffs,
> showing the successfully merged entries as the result of merge.
>
> I am inclined to munge your patch to do this:

This I have done, and pushed out to "pu" for tonight.  After
doing some more test I'll have this graduate to "master"
sometime tomorrow along with other accumulated changes.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed Nov 30 20:06:31 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-30 20:06:42 EST