Re: git versus CVS (versus bk)

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: 2005-11-01 20:17:11
Dear diary, on Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:29:15AM CET, I got a letter
where Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> told me that...
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 02:02:43PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > I'm really surprised that Calalin hasn't chimed in. If you are into
> > rewriting/merging/splitting your patches, StGIT is your friend. Check
> > out:  http://www.procode.org/stgit/
> 
> 	But I'm not.  I don't want patches in the first place.  I want
> cg-pull but with a flattened history.

StGIT does not work with patches but with commits. You can manage the
logical changes with StGIT and when it's time, just merge your
StGIT-tracked branch with whatever else. "Patch" here is really just a
different name for logical change / commit.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
VI has two modes: the one in which it beeps and the one in which
it doesn't.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Nov 01 20:17:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-01 20:17:51 EST