On Tue, 1 Nov 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On 11/1/05, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote: >> I really really prefer gitk in the core, even if it means that there's >> that strange tcl/tk dependency. > > I agree, but that's kind of a bummer for servers where someone just > wants to publish a couple of repos. tk depends on xlibs/libx11 and > that's just _nasty_. > > git-core should be good for deployment on a server. Perhaps we want to > provide a git-scm package that brings in all the goodies you're likely > to want, including gitk? for debian make it a reccomendation not a requirement, for RPM the admins will just have to override the dependancy (it's not like they don't have to do this for a bunch of other packages that have an optional GUI piece, RPM just doesn't have the option to list a reccomendation) David Lang -- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. -- C.A.R. Hoare - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Nov 01 08:32:48 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-11-01 08:32:52 EST