Re: [RFC] multi_ack protocol v2

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: 2005-10-28 05:15:14

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> A completely tested patch (unfortunately in the middle of my work) does 
> not touch get_remote_heads() at all:

Much nicer.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Received on Fri Oct 28 05:15:51 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Johannes Schindelin: "Re: [TENTATIVE PATCH] Complain loudly, dying, when a ref is invalid"
Previous message: Junio C Hamano: "Re: [TENTATIVE PATCH] Complain loudly, dying, when a ref is invalid"
In reply to: Johannes Schindelin: "Re: [RFC] multi_ack protocol v2"
Next in thread: Paul Mackerras: "Re: [RFC] multi_ack protocol v2"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-10-28 05:15:55 EST