Re: Make "gitk" work better with dense revlists

From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Date: 2005-10-27 16:16:25
Linus Torvalds writes:

> So this makes gitk just show the diff of _that_ commit.

Committed and pushed out, but ...

> Also, having now tested the previous "handle root commit in the 
> TREECHANGED" logic a bit more, I think it's (a) stable and (b) the right 
> thing to do. Sign me off on that one too.

What is that about?

I'm hoping to get back to gitk hacking RSN - I've been going flat out
on the ppc32/ppc64 merge.  Thanks for doing the --dense thing; I was
thinking about doing something like that inside gitk but doing it in
git-rev-list is better.  It does mean that I now want to be able to
get gitk to contract the view to just a given set of files or
directories and then expand back to the whole tree view, which means
running git-rev-list multiple times, which gitk can't do at the
moment...

Paul.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Thu Oct 27 16:17:52 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-10-27 16:17:56 EST