On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 01:21:14AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > The assumption, which is the property the suggested packing > strategy has, is that older objects that are needed to complete > the history leading to the current tip are packed in those > n-month/n-week packs, so if we do not have them we would likely > be needing them, although we might not have walked that far back > in history yet. Gotcha - I'm still thinking in terms of content distribution, where you only need a specific version of a tree to be available locally and explicitly don't want to transfer history. In our case, using packs doesn't make sense at the moment. -- For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Oct 18 03:42:12 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-10-18 03:42:15 EST