Alex Riesen, Fri, Oct 07, 2005 22:54:50 +0200: > Linus Torvalds, Fri, Oct 07, 2005 17:34:19 +0200: > > > it suddenly get worse: now I'm stuck on git-pull. > > > > > > git-merge-index (called at some point by git-pull) maps the index > > > in, and starts git-merge-one-file for each (or the given) entry in > > > the index. git-merge-one-file calls git-update-index, which wants > > > to update the index. Which doesn't work, because it's locked by > > > that piece of s$%^. > > > > NOTE! git doesn't use mmap() because it _needs_ to use mmap(), but because > > it was simple to do that way, and it's a total idiosyncracy of mine that I > > often try to mmap the data. I often also tend to do my own allocators > > instead of using malloc() (see my "sparse" project in case you're > > interested in other idiosyncracies of mine - macros to do list traversal > > etc). > > > > The fact is, "mmap()" isn't really any better than "read()": it has some > > advantages wrt memory management for the kernel, which is probably one big > > reason why I do it, but quite frankly, if you were to change every single > > mmap() to be a "map_file()" instead, and made it optional whether it used > > mmap() or "malloc + read()", I personally don't think it would be > > horrible. > > > > And it might make things much simpler for portability. The "use mmap" > > approach is very much a unixism, particularly the way unix people do it > > (mmap followed by close, making the file descriptor "go away"). Sure, > > other OS's have mmap too, but I think on them it tends to be less commonly > > used. > > "Sounds like a thinly veiled threat or a very effective prodding" 8) > Junio C Hamano, Fri, Oct 07, 2005 23:00:02 +0200: > Huh? where is your memcpy? Unbelievable... I actually tested the change! But not _the_ patch. Thanks. Next time, hit me :) --- Make read_cache copy the index into memory, to improve portability on other OS's which have mmap too, tend to use it less commonly. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> diff --git a/read-cache.c b/read-cache.c --- a/read-cache.c +++ b/read-cache.c @@ -497,9 +497,12 @@ int read_cache(void) offset = sizeof(*hdr); for (i = 0; i < active_nr; i++) { struct cache_entry *ce = map + offset; - offset = offset + ce_size(ce); - active_cache[i] = ce; + size_t size = ce_size(ce); + struct cache_entry *newce = malloc(size); + offset = offset + size; + active_cache[i] = memcpy(newce, ce, size); } + munmap(map, size); return active_nr; unmap: - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Oct 08 07:23:56 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-10-08 07:24:00 EST