Re: What shall we do with the GECOS field again?

From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Date: 2005-09-20 02:34:39
Dear diary, on Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 06:16:47PM CEST, I got a letter
where A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> told me that...
> >Sure, many organizations bake their own, but I'd argue that the majority
> >doesn't.
> 
> The point is we should not be telling them what and how to put stuff in 
> the GECOS field.

The point is that our guess should be something which works for the most
people.

> >>AND/OR to include 
> >>the what Git thinks the user's name name might be in the commit message
> >>template they're editing (like the file list).
> >
> >I think that's a good idea, as long as people are told how to change it
> >(i.e., an envvar -- NOT by editing the file).
> 
> Yes.

I'll change cg-commit to always include the name/email fields in its
template. I think it's verbose enough as it is now, though, and I don't
want it to bloat it with more generic help text. I've expanded the
documentation of cg-commit on the GIT_ variables and that ought to be
enough. :-)

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching
someone.  -- Alan Cox
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Sep 20 02:35:14 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-09-20 02:35:47 EST