Re: [PATCH/RFC] "Recursive Make considered harmful"

From: A Large Angry SCM <>
Date: 2005-07-29 03:09:37
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> While I agree gitk should not come as part of git package, this
> brings up a different issue.
> Ideally, I'd want to see gitk packaged from its repository
> Paul Mackerras maintains, not
> from GIT one which _will_ lag behind.
> While I _do_ rely on gitk in my git work, and I _do_ like its
> simplicity (just a single file right now), my longer term
> preference is to drop the copy we have in git tree and treat it
> just like the other repository browser, qgit.  Our documentation
> should point people at it as part of the Porcelain suite.

Then this should happen sooner rather than later.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Received on Fri Jul 29 03:13:28 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-07-29 03:13:29 EST