Re: Tags

From: Kevin Smith <yarcs@qualitycode.com>
Date: 2005-07-04 08:34:57
Dan Holmsand wrote:
> So why not add tags to the branch itself?
> 
> It should be pretty straightforward: just make git look for tag refs in, 
> say, a .gittags tree in the current HEAD. The whole thing would pretty 
> much as if you've symlinked .git/refs/tags to .gittags in the current 
> working tree, except that tag refs would have to be read directly from 
> the repository.
> 
> That way, tag refs could be handled pretty much just like any other 
> git-managed file: they can be added, deleted, changed, merged, 
> committed, etc. We could track their history, and see who tagged what 
> and when.

Sounds like the way mercurial handles tags. It really seemed weird to me 
at first, but the more I think about it, the more it makes sense. Even 
more so after reading this thread :-)

   http://www.serpentine.com/mercurial/index.cgi?Tag

Kevin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sat Jul 09 16:54:11 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-07-09 16:54:12 EST