On Jun 28, 2005, at 20:25:02, Sean wrote: > there will be a price to pay if the linux community fragments over > choice > of scm. I don't agree. With the current set of SCMs, I don't think it will be long before somebody invents a gitweb/Mercurial/whatever gateway, such that I can "hg serve" from my Mercurial repository and have Linus "git pull" from a multiprotocol bridge. > the good news is that we're no longer locked into the whims of > some proprietary system. so it should be straight forward for > those who > choose any tool to work with those who've chosen another. this is > already > evidenced by the fact that the git repository is pulled and re- > exeported > with mecurial. I agree completely! Cheers to the end of proprietary revision storage! > anyway, all the best, just wish you guys would spend less time > trying to > convert git users and more time advancing your own tool. A project with no users isn't much of a project, now is it? In any case, this thread has long since passed its usefulness, so let's let it die, ok? Cheers, Kyle Moffett -- I lost interest in "blade servers" when I found they didn't throw knives at people who weren't supposed to be in your machine room. -- Anthony de Boer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed Jun 29 13:56:50 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-06-29 13:56:55 EST