>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes: LT> If we want to expand a packed file and really write the objects to the LT> .git/objects directories, we should just not have that packed file in the LT> .git/objects/pack directory. What I was aiming for was this: (1) Introduce an interface to sha1_file.c that lets you say "use this file as one of the packs, although it is not under .git/objects/pack"; (2) Introduce another interface to sha1_file.c that lets you enumerate the index entries for a given pack file. (3) Remove the unpacking logic from unpack-object.c; instead call the above interfaces to register the pack and enumerate entries, and call read_sha1_file() followed by write_sha1_file() with do_expand repeatedly. However, the infrastructure (1) and (2) may end up being a special case only to support unpack-object (and removing the code duplication for unpacking), in which case what you suggest would make more sense. LT> And if we have a pack-file in .git/objects/ that already has LT> the object, that may not be the _same_ pack-file that we're LT> expanding at all, so if that pack file already has the LT> object, then not writing it out is actually the right thing LT> to do. This I have to think about a bit. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Jun 28 13:35:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-06-28 13:35:04 EST