On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > Hi, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > I suspect there > > would be a massive additional support needed if you want to make it easy > > for Paul to pull changes made to gitk in your tree. > > I don't think that's possible; after all, the trees are now merged, so any > pull would fetch all of Linus' tree. Linus could do: git-read-tree gitk-head git-update-cache gitk git-commit-tree `write-tree` -p gitk-head > gitk-patched-head git-read-tree HEAD git merge gitk-patched-head (or, better, use a separate index file for the gitk index) (to commit changes to the gitk script made in a git working directory) The change I proposed earlier would be so that the system would know what was going on and users wouldn't have to. Then someone who didn't know that gitk was (also) a separate project and just committed changes to it would still generate gitk commits when appropriate. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Jun 25 03:55:09 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-06-25 03:55:12 EST