>>>>> "JS" == Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes: JS> test_output_expect_success JS> If you like, I'll generalize it and move it into testlib.sh Sounds sensible, and yes please I prefer to have it in testlib.sh, and you would get bonus points if you converted some (I do not demand you do all of them ;-)) existing cat/echo users while you are at it. Except for some minor points. I do not think use of "local" to help readability is absolutely necessary in this small function, and if it is a bashism, I prefer to see it written in a more portable form. I was thinking about removing bashism from the test scripts, although I have not gotten around to actually doing it [*1*, *2*]. [Footnotes] *1* Auditing all the shell scripts to look for quoting bugs while eradicating bashism would be another good "Janitor" sub-project if somebody is interested on the list. I do not know what happend to other items on the Janitor project list. Personally I liked the one Sean did to redo the command line parameters using argp. *2* Not that I claim what I have already written is bash free. I do not have a handy reference that lists which is bashism and which is in POSIX. To stay away from bashism, I just try not to use certain things that I did not use when I was introduced to shell programming. That list includes "${parameter#word}", "${!parameter}", "function" and "local". - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Fri Jun 10 06:55:20 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-06-10 06:55:22 EST