Re: git-rev-list: proper lazy reachability

From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Date: 2005-06-05 05:30:50
>>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:

LT> On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>> Does this fix it for you (untested, of course)?

Will check later.

LT> Would people prefer to have "git-rev-list" take arguments like
LT> 	git-rev-list a b ^c ^d
LT> the way git-rev-tree does?

I do not expect myself to maintain many heads like Jeff, I
cannot comment on how well that "many heads" feature would work
in practice, but I would vote "a ^b" syntax to match
git-rev-tree.





-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Sun Jun 05 05:31:15 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-06-05 05:31:17 EST