Re: I want to release a "git-1.0"

>>>>> "DL" == David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com> writes:

DL> Hmm, thinking out loud. would it help to look at the deltify scripts
DL> and let them find the major chunks and then look in detail only when
DL> that fails?

It's unclear to me which part you are trying to help with
deltify algorithm [*1*].

Internally, git-diff-cache -B -C is used which does use the
deltify to locate complete rewrites, renames and copies (that's
why the script is so slow).  For passing on and assigning blames
line by line, parsing "diff --unified=0" output was a lot easier
for this script and that was what I did in this quick-and-dirty
version.


[Footnotes]

*1* David says "deltify" and Nico calls it "deltafy".  I am not
a native speaker so I cannot tell, but which one is correct?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html