David Mansfield wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > >>On Tue, 24 May 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> >>>Fixing the branch handling shows that cvsps does some really strange >>>things with the newly added "Ancestor grpah". Here's one example: >> >> >>Ahh, looking at cvsps source, I think I see what's going on. >> >>It's deciding the "previous branch" by looking at what the previous branch >>for the first individual file in the PatchSet was, which fails because in >>this case, PatchSet 372 was changing "syslinux.doc", and Patchset 374 was >>changing "syslinux.c", and thus the previous version of the individual >>_files_ were both in the HEAD branch. >> >>So it does look like I should just ignore the "Ancestor branch" >>information if the new branch already existed. >> > > > I've attached what I just committed. The previous 'show ancestor' patch > needs to be reversed and this applied. It works for me on a half-dozen > repos including syslinux. > Oops. I forgot to metion I made the tracking of branch ancestry an option because it potentially increases the cpu time a fair margin (though here it seemed trivial). You need to pass '-A' as an additional argument. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Wed May 25 06:10:51 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-05-25 06:10:51 EST