Re: 'read-tree -m head' vs 'read-tree head'

From: Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@stud.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: 2005-05-04 17:01:48
Hello Junio,

>     Normally "read-tree -m" is the preferred form from
>     performance point of view, especially on a large project.
>     The only case you need to use "read-tree" without -m is when
>     the cache contains conflicting merge results and you want to
>     start from scratch.

thanks for the bottom line. That explains why Linus uses it in his
git-pull-script.

	Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Wed May 04 17:02:03 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-05-04 17:02:03 EST