On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes: > > LT> Absolutely. I use the same "git-pull-script" between two local directories > LT> on disk... > LT> Of course, I don't bother with the linking. But that's the trivial part. > > Would it be useful if somebody wrote local-pull.c similar to > http-pull.c, which clones one local SHA_FILE_DIRECTORY to > another, with an option to (1) try hardlink and if it fails > fail; (2) try hardlink and if it fails try symlink and if it > fails fail; (3) try hardlink and if it fails try copy and if it > fails fail? If someone does this, they should make a pull.c out of http-pull and rpull; the logic for determining what you need to copy, given what you have and what the user wants to have, should be shared. (Note that some usage patterns only require the latest commit, or at least can deal with fetching other stuff only when needed.) -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Apr 30 07:47:00 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-04-30 07:47:01 EST