Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
Date: 2005-04-26 11:49:50
On Monday 25 April 2005 20:41, Matt Mackall wrote:
> Despite the above, it compares pretty well to git in speed and is
> quite a bit better in terms of storage space. By reducing the zlib
> compression level, it could probably win across the board.

Hi Matt,

Congratulations on an impressive demo!  How about actually checking the 
compression vs wall clock theory?  And I probably don't have to mention 
psyco...

Regards,

Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Received on Tue Apr 26 13:25:47 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-04-26 13:25:47 EST