bit contains various pieces and snippets from Linus' and your scripts and thus automatically falls under GPL. Maybe I should have stated that somewhere explicitly, but its a 800 lines bash script for crying out loud. The "GNU" part was actually more like a joke. If you feel offended by it, I am happy to remove it. Are there any trademark issues involved in using "GNU"? Andreas PS: Unrelated note. There is a GNU GIT project (some graphical file manager thing or so). On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 08:24:24AM CEST, I got a letter > where Andreas Gal <gal@uci.edu> told me that... > > HELP > > > > Try "bit --help" to get some simple instructions how to use BIT. All > > commands have builtin help as well. Try "bit commit --help". Not all > > options are always implemented. Feel free to send me a patch. > > Do you intend to licence it as free software? Also, you call it "GNU > BIT". Does that mean it is part of the GNU project? > > -- > Petr "Pasky" Baudis > Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ > C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Tue Apr 26 07:36:12 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-04-26 07:36:12 EST