> Alecs King wrote: > >> >> And as for bash, only gitdiff-do and gitlog.sh 'explicitly' use bash >> instead of /bin/sh. On most Linux distros, /bin/sh is just a symbolic >> link to bash. But not on some others. I found gitlsobj.sh could not >> work using a plain /bin/sh on fbsd. To make life easier, i think it >> might be better if we all explicitly use bash for all shell scripts. H. Peter Anvin wrote: > How about #!/bin/bash (build from .in files if you feel it necessary to > support systems which don't have bash in /bin) instead of doubling the > number of execs? If # of execs is that critical, it probably should not be in bash anyway. OpenBSD (at least 3.1)'s bash appears to be in /usr/local/bin/bash, NOT /bin/bash. I'd go with the /bin/env solution for now; it maximizes the "it just works" factor, and when it comes time for .in files much of the cogito code (at least) will probably be rewritten in Perl, and anything performance-sensitive will be in C. --- David A. Wheeler - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Apr 23 12:32:25 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-04-23 12:32:26 EST