On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:00:33AM CEST, I got a letter > where Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> told me that... > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > > > > Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 09:46:35PM CEST, I got a letter > > > where Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> told me that... > > > > > > Huh. Why? You just go back to history until you find a commit you > > > already have. If you did it the way as Tony described, if you have that > > > commit, you can be sure that you have everything it depends on too. > > > > But if you download 1000 files of the 1010 you need, and then your network > > goes down, you will need to download those 1000 again when it comes back, > > because you can't save them unless you have the full history. > > Why can't I? I think I can do that perfectly fine. The worst thing that > can happen is that fsck-cache will complain a bit. Not if you're using the fact that you don't have them to tell you that you still need the other 10, which is what tony's scheme would do. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.htmlReceived on Sat Apr 23 09:12:58 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 2005-04-23 09:12:58 EST